PFA tries to separate four jobs that are easy to blur together: evidence records what we can support, Intelligence organizes those records into current signals, editorial explains what the signals mean for a trader, and research looks for broader patterns across firms and time.
That separation matters. A payout screenshot is evidence, not proof that every payout is fast. A current rule is data, not proof that it has always been the rule. A firm response belongs next to the complaint it addresses, not in place of the complaint. A ranking is a comparison produced by a stated methodology, not a promise about what will happen to an individual trader.
When the evidence is thin, the correct answer is sometimes that we do not know enough yet. We prefer an incomplete but honest record to a confident statement built on assumptions.
